Как было бы похвально, если бы люди столько же упражняли свой мозг, сколько упражняют тело, и так же рьяно стремились к добродетели, как они стремятся к удовольствиям.
Сенека
High Quality Content by WIKIPEDIA articles! Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel, 524 U.S. 498 (1998), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act (Coal Act) constituted an unconstitutional regulatory taking of property which required the Act to be invalidated. The import of this decision is that it was made in the context of a purely economic regulation. The plurality examines the statute and its resultant harm as an ad hoc factual inquiry based on factors delineated in Penn Central such as the economic impact of the regulation, its interference with reasonable investment backed expectations, and the character of the governmental action.(Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City), The decision thereby moved beyond the traditional notions of equal protection which had been applied to economic regulation since the time of (Lochner v. New York), requiring extreme deference to Congress, and applied a regulatory takings...